INTERNET ADDICTION
ABSTRACT:
The Internet is considered as one of
the most important foundations of the modern society. Its creation and introduction to the world during the late
19th century has brought about a large heap of development as to how humans
perceive the importance of communication, connection and information. Internet Addiction is defined as any online-related,
compulsive behaviour which interferes with normal living and causes severe
stress on family, friends, loved ones, and one’s work environment. The purpose
of this study is to identify the extend of Internet Addiction present among the
students of VIII A of R.M.H.S.S, Vadavucode. The standard Internet Addiction Tool was used for
the test. The study showed that most of the
students of class 8A of R.M.H.S.S, Vadavucode have moderate level of Internet Addiction.
INTRODUCTION:
Internet Addiction is described as an
impulse control disorder, which does not involve use of an intoxicating drug
and is very similar to pathological gambling. Some Internet users may
develop an emotional attachment to on-line friends and activities they create
on their computer screens. Internet users may enjoy aspects of the Internet
that allow them to meet, socialize, and exchange ideas through the use of chat
rooms, social networking websites, or "virtual
communities." Other Internet users spend endless hours
researching topics of interest Online or "blogging". Blogging
is a contraction of the term "Web log", in which an individual will
post commentaries and keep regular chronicle of events. It can be viewed
as journaling and the entries are primarily textual.
The Internet Addiction Test (IAT) is a
reliable measure that covers the key characteristics of pathological online
use. The test measures the extend of the client’s involvement with the computer
and classifies the addictive behaviour in terms of mild, moderate and severe
impairment.
AIM:
To study the extend of Internet Addiction
present among the students of VIII A of R.M.H.S.S, Vadavucode.
DESCRIPTION
OF THE MATERIALS:
The standard Internet Addiction Tool
was used for the test. The IAT was the first validated instrument for
the assessment of Internet and computer Addiction. A study by Kimberly Young
found that the IAT is a reliable measure, covering the most important
elements characteristics of pathological Internet use. There are 20 items in
the rating scale. Young people are asked to rate the degree to which they
experience each symptom in a 5 point frequency scale. Each question of the
questionnaire addresses the frequency of certain Internet addition symptoms,
measured on a five point scale with score of 0 to 5 from “rarely/ never”,
“every once in a while”, “sometimes”, “often” and “always”. The minimum score is
20 and maximum score is 100.
PROCEDURE:
The study
was conducted on students of 8A class of R.M.H.S.S, Vadavucode. For the
study, a standard test item on Internet Addiction Test was selected. The scale
opens by asking the child to read and follow the instructions in the printed
questionnaire. The child is asked to rate the 5 point scale: “rarely/ never”,
“every once in a while”, “sometimes”, “often” and “always” to indicate how
often each of these items happens to them. There is no set time period over
which the judgement has to be made. The response is made by circling the
appropriate frequency word. Later the items were scored according to the
response of the students.
SCORING:
Only the 20 items are scored.
The responses are scored:
Never/ Rarely = 1
Every once in a while =2
Sometimes = 3
Often = 4
Always = 5
This yields a maximum
possible score of 100.
No.
|
Name of the
student
|
Total Score
|
1
|
Abhishek Anil
|
82
|
2
|
Abin P.B
|
52
|
3
|
Aby Manikunju
|
54
|
4
|
Aleena Sivan
|
81
|
5
|
Amal Mohan
|
50
|
6
|
Alwin Skaria
|
60
|
7
|
Ananya Kumaran
|
54
|
8
|
Ancy Mathai
|
40
|
9
|
Ansa Sunny
|
50
|
10
|
Anto Basil Paul
|
42
|
11
|
Anu George
|
84
|
12
|
Bency T Kurian
|
56
|
13
|
Devika K.A
|
27
|
14
|
Halam Salam
|
73
|
15
|
Jeevan Grigar
|
80
|
16
|
Meenu Varghese
|
62
|
17
|
Melvin Babu
|
55
|
18
|
Milan P Thomas
|
74
|
19
|
Sandra Paul
|
76
|
20
|
Sara Babu
|
23
|
21
|
Shalu R
|
58
|
22
|
Silpa George
|
40
|
23
|
Sara Babu
|
29
|
24
|
Sreelakshmi
E.H
|
74
|
25
|
Sona Saji
|
44
|
26
|
Tony Babu
|
85
|
27
|
Teena
Paul
|
78
|
28
|
Veena M.J
|
48
|
29
|
Vrinda
Akhil
|
53
|
RESULTS:
Level of Addiction
|
Standard
score
|
Number of
responses
|
|
High level
|
80-100
|
5
|
|
Moderate level
|
50-79
|
16
|
|
Low level /No Addiction
|
20-49
|
8
|
|
Total no of students
|
29
|
29
|
|
Total number of students =29
Minimum score obtained = 23
Maximum score obtained = 85
Average score obtained = 50
The standard scoring for high level of Internet Addiction is in between
80-100; for moderate level of Internet Addiction is between 50-79 and for low
or no Addiction is between 20-49. The study showed that most of the students of
class 8A of St Peter’s Higher Secondary School, Kolenchery have moderate level
of Internet Addiction. The maximum score observed was 85 and the lowest score
was 23.
Thus, with the help of statistical tool, it
has been found that the students of 8A R.M.H.S.S, Vadavucode have
moderate level of Internet Addiction.
CONCLUSION:
The extend of Internet Addiction of each
individual is different. It depends on many factors such as life style, access
to Internet working, parents, neighbourhood, peers etc. The study shows that the students of 8 A R.M.H.S.S, Vadavucode have moderate level of Internet
Addiction. It may be because peer and parents have only given them either
limited access or may not be able to afford it. Some of the students have no
access at all.
Allowing students to have controlled access to
interest is good as they should be aware of the latest developments happening
in and around the world. It also helps them to access education related
information. But when the Internet access becomes uncontrolled or uncontrolled,
it becomes a curse. Then the students will not be able to understand the pros
and cons of the Internet. So it is the responsibility of the parents and the
teachers to educate their children regarding the good and bad effects of Internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment